Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4 5/6] tests/kms_ccs: Test case where CCS is on a different BO

2017-10-08 Thread Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Ben Widawsky writes: > On 17-09-27 15:34:18, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >>Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi > > Did someone recommend this test? While we have some hardware limitations on > current generations that make it difficult to use multiple BOs, it's certainly > not impossible,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4 5/6] tests/kms_ccs: Test case where CCS is on a different BO

2017-10-03 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 17-09-27 15:34:18, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Did someone recommend this test? While we have some hardware limitations on current generations that make it difficult to use multiple BOs, it's certainly not impossible, and future HW might make this l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4 5/6] tests/kms_ccs: Test case where CCS is on a different BO

2017-10-03 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:34:18PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/inte

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4 5/6] tests/kms_ccs: Test case where CCS is on a different BO

2017-09-27 Thread Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi --- tests/kms_ccs.c | 17 ++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_ccs.c b/tests/kms_ccs.c index 35dfcca6be14..2d7105eb1323 100644 --- a/tests/kms_ccs.c +++ b/tests/kms_ccs.c @@ -34,10 +34,11 @@ enum test_fla