On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 09:40:59AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 17-09-27 15:34:19, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> >Two scenarios tested:
> > - unaligned stride
> > - Stride too small
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
>
> Jason, could you provide your
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 01:57:13PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:34:19PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> > Two scenarios tested:
> > - unaligned stride
> > - Stride too small
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
>
>
Ben Widawsky writes:
> On 17-09-27 15:34:19, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>>Two scenarios tested:
>> - unaligned stride
>> - Stride too small
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
>
> Jason, could you provide your opinion on this? I've
On 17-09-27 15:34:19, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
Two scenarios tested:
- unaligned stride
- Stride too small
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Jason, could you provide your opinion on this? I've always felt the kernel
interface shouldn't be validating
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:34:19PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Two scenarios tested:
> - unaligned stride
> - Stride too small
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Fails on APL
Two scenarios tested:
- unaligned stride
- Stride too small
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
---
tests/kms_ccs.c | 23 ++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_ccs.c b/tests/kms_ccs.c
index