Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:22:56PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:46:01AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:46:01AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:07:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > For the basic error state,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:46:01AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:07:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > For the basic error state, we only desire that an error state be created > > > following a hang.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:46:01AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:07:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > For the basic error state, we only desire that an error state be created > > > following a hang.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:07:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > For the basic error state, we only desire that an error state be created > > following a hang. For that purpose, we do not need a real hang (slow > > 6-12s) but can

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:07:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > For the basic error state, we only desire that an error state be created > following a hang. For that purpose, we do not need a real hang (slow > 6-12s) but can inject one instead (fast <1s). > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/drv_hangman: Use manual error-state generation

2016-10-20 Thread Chris Wilson
For the basic error state, we only desire that an error state be created following a hang. For that purpose, we do not need a real hang (slow 6-12s) but can inject one instead (fast <1s). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- tests/drv_hangman.c | 14 +++--- 1 file