Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-10-09 14:36:27)
> Title: s/thresh/thrash/
>
> On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 13:55 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > At the moment, the verify tests use an extremely brutal write-read of
> > every dword, degrading performance to UC. If we break those up into
> > cachelines, we
Title: s/thresh/thrash/
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 13:55 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> At the moment, the verify tests use an extremely brutal write-read of
> every dword, degrading performance to UC. If we break those up into
> cachelines, we can do a wcb write/read at a time instead, roughly 8x
>
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-08-23 13:55:55)
> At the moment, the verify tests use an extremely brutal write-read of
> every dword, degrading performance to UC. If we break those up into
> cachelines, we can do a wcb write/read at a time instead, roughly 8x
> faster. We lose the accuracy of the
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-08-23 13:55:55)
> At the moment, the verify tests use an extremely brutal write-read of
> every dword, degrading performance to UC. If we break those up into
> cachelines, we can do a wcb write/read at a time instead, roughly 8x
> faster. We lose the accuracy of the
At the moment, the verify tests use an extremely brutal write-read of
every dword, degrading performance to UC. If we break those up into
cachelines, we can do a wcb write/read at a time instead, roughly 8x
faster. We lose the accuracy of the forced wcb flushes around every dword,
but we are
