On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:31:40PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-02-20 15:44:38)
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 02:33:08PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > PSR may not exit instantaneously, so while asserting that PSR is
> > > disabled after an action, we may have to wait a
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-02-20 15:44:38)
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 02:33:08PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > PSR may not exit instantaneously, so while asserting that PSR is
> > disabled after an action, we may have to wait a short while. Currently
> > that wait is waiting for PSR to enabled
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 02:33:08PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> PSR may not exit instantaneously, so while asserting that PSR is
> disabled after an action, we may have to wait a short while. Currently
> that wait is waiting for PSR to enabled and expecting to timeout; this
> fails when we start
PSR may not exit instantaneously, so while asserting that PSR is
disabled after an action, we may have to wait a short while. Currently
that wait is waiting for PSR to enabled and expecting to timeout; this
fails when we start the assertion with PSR already enabled. Fix the wait
to wait until PSR
