Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/pm_rps: Increase load for waitboosting

2018-01-18 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-18 11:37:44) > > On 13/01/2018 19:20, Chris Wilson wrote: > > The waitboost subtests encode internal knowledge of the kernel, and > > should we wish to change how the kernel functions, we also need to > > update the test (or reconfigure it somehow to express

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/pm_rps: Increase load for waitboosting

2018-01-18 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 13/01/2018 19:20, Chris Wilson wrote: The waitboost subtests encode internal knowledge of the kernel, and should we wish to change how the kernel functions, we also need to update the test (or reconfigure it somehow to express desired latencies for certain workloads). One such change

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/pm_rps: Increase load for waitboosting

2018-01-18 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-01-13 19:20:21) > The waitboost subtests encode internal knowledge of the kernel, and > should we wish to change how the kernel functions, we also need to > update the test (or reconfigure it somehow to express desired latencies > for certain workloads). One such change

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/pm_rps: Increase load for waitboosting

2018-01-13 Thread Chris Wilson
The waitboost subtests encode internal knowledge of the kernel, and should we wish to change how the kernel functions, we also need to update the test (or reconfigure it somehow to express desired latencies for certain workloads). One such change proposed is to remove the waitboost if the target