subject:"\[Intel\-gfx\] \[PATCH igt\] igt\/vc4_dmabuf_poll\: Add a test for polling to wait for dmabuf fences."

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/vc4_dmabuf_poll: Add a test for polling to wait for dmabuf fences.

2017-06-07 Thread Eric Anholt

Daniel Vetter writes: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:24:32PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: >> This successfully catches vc4's lack of dmabuf fencing. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt >> --- >> >> Has anyone looked into shared infrastructure for tests to do >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/vc4_dmabuf_poll: Add a test for polling to wait for dmabuf fences.

2017-04-12 Thread Daniel Vetter

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:24:32PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > This successfully catches vc4's lack of dmabuf fencing. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt > --- > > Has anyone looked into shared infrastructure for tests to do > KMS/dmabuf/etc. things with a generic "get a BO that's

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/vc4_dmabuf_poll: Add a test for polling to wait for dmabuf fences.

2017-04-10 Thread Eric Anholt

This successfully catches vc4's lack of dmabuf fencing. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- Has anyone looked into shared infrastructure for tests to do KMS/dmabuf/etc. things with a generic "get a BO that's being rendered to for this driver" call? tests/Makefile.am | 2 ++