[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Remove gem_ctx_basic

2017-11-28 Thread Chris Wilson
This is just a very plain stress test that doesn't do any verification, and is entirely duplicated by the other context tests. The test currently leaks objects from every thread on every pass (which is triggering an oom on smaller machines), while fixing it would be trivial, it also is pointless as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Remove gem_ctx_basic

2017-11-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 23:19 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > This is just a very plain stress test that doesn't do any verification, > and is entirely duplicated by the other context tests. The test > currently leaks objects from every thread on every pass, while fixing it > would be trivial, it also i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Remove gem_ctx_basic

2017-11-27 Thread Chris Wilson
This is just a very plain stress test that doesn't do any verification, and is entirely duplicated by the other context tests. The test currently leaks objects from every thread on every pass, while fixing it would be trivial, it also is pointless as the test is of little merit. Signed-off-by: Chr