On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:50:06PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> NAK on these with the current drv_selftest code.
They are just slightly out of date.
> The subtest enumeration on IGT's side needs to contain these subtests
> even if the running kernel doesn't have selftests, or these particular
NAK on these with the current drv_selftest code.
The subtest enumeration on IGT's side needs to contain these subtests
even if the running kernel doesn't have selftests, or these particular
subtests.
--
Petri Latvala
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:18:00AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> These are
Hi,
> >
> > Add basic somewhere in the test names?
>
> Why? Does something still parse basic in the test name and add it to a test
No
> set? Shouldn't that now be pulling from these lists instead?
You are right, yes , we control only static list and addition to it through
reviews, Petri, more
Op 02-02-17 om 14:44 schreef Chris Wilson:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:30:19PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 02-02-17 om 10:18 schreef Chris Wilson:
>>> These are meant to be fast and sensitive to new (and old) bugs...
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
>>> Cc:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:30:19PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 02-02-17 om 10:18 schreef Chris Wilson:
> > These are meant to be fast and sensitive to new (and old) bugs...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> > Cc: Petri Latvala
> >
Op 02-02-17 om 10:18 schreef Chris Wilson:
> These are meant to be fast and sensitive to new (and old) bugs...
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Petri Latvala
> ---
> tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 19 +++
> 1 file
These are meant to be fast and sensitive to new (and old) bugs...
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Petri Latvala
---
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git