Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-04-26 Thread Lis, Tomasz
On 2018-03-30 21:45, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: On 30/03/18 08:42, Lis, Tomasz wrote: On 2018-03-29 00:28, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Lis, Tomasz (2018-03-28 17:06:58) On 2018-03-28 01:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) The patch adds support of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-04-12 Thread Lis, Tomasz
On 2018-03-30 20:23, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: On 27/03/18 16:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from Context

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-30 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 30/03/18 08:42, Lis, Tomasz wrote: On 2018-03-29 00:28, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Lis, Tomasz (2018-03-28 17:06:58) On 2018-03-28 01:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-30 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 27/03/18 16:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from Context Status Buffer. Preemption in previous gens required a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-30 Thread Lis, Tomasz
On 2018-03-29 00:28, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Lis, Tomasz (2018-03-28 17:06:58) On 2018-03-28 01:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Lis, Tomasz (2018-03-28 17:06:58) > > > On 2018-03-28 01:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) > >> The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper > >> bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-28 Thread Lis, Tomasz
On 2018-03-28 01:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from Context Status Buffer. Preemption in previous gens required a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-03-27 16:17:59) > The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper > bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from > Context Status Buffer. > > Preemption in previous gens required a special batch buffer to be executed,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-03-27 Thread Tomasz Lis
The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from Context Status Buffer. Preemption in previous gens required a special batch buffer to be executed, so the Command Streamer never preempted to idle