On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 15:11 +0200, stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 14:40 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Stanislav Lisovskiy <
> > stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com> wrote:
> > > We might be willing to call intel_atomic_get_old_global_obj_state
> > > and
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 14:40 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Stanislav Lisovskiy <
> stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com> wrote:
> > We might be willing to call intel_atomic_get_old_global_obj_state
> > and intel_atomic_get_new_global_obj_state right away, however
> > those are not
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> We might be willing to call intel_atomic_get_old_global_obj_state
> and intel_atomic_get_new_global_obj_state right away, however
> those are not initializing global obj state as
> intel_atomic_get_global_obj_state does.
> Extracted initializing
We might be willing to call intel_atomic_get_old_global_obj_state
and intel_atomic_get_new_global_obj_state right away, however
those are not initializing global obj state as
intel_atomic_get_global_obj_state does.
Extracted initializing part to separate function and now using this
also in
