Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-31 Thread Todd Previte
Paulo Zanoni mailto:przan...@gmail.com Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:53 PM 2014-07-22 18:11 GMT-03:00 Jesse Barnesjbar...@virtuousgeek.org: On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:53:44 +0200 Daniel Vetterdan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnesjbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: Are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:53:57PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: 2014-07-22 18:11 GMT-03:00 Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org: On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:53:44 +0200 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: Are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-29 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-07-22 18:11 GMT-03:00 Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org: On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:53:44 +0200 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: Are you saying you'll reject this approach entirely? I'm saying that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Todd Previte wrote: This patch set adds the foundational support for Displayport compliance testing in the i915 driver. It implements the framework for automated test support that preclude the need (most) for operator input during testing. Tests for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-22 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:41:11 +0200 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Todd Previte wrote: This patch set adds the foundational support for Displayport compliance testing in the i915 driver. It implements the framework for automated test support

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: Are you saying you'll reject this approach entirely? I'm saying that I don't see terrible lot of value in adding a bunch of code for a sticker, and that we should look into making it actually useful by testing the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-22 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:48:45 -0700 Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:41:11 +0200 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Todd Previte wrote: This patch set adds the foundational support for Displayport compliance

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-22 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:53:44 +0200 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: Are you saying you'll reject this approach entirely? I'm saying that I don't see terrible lot of value in adding a bunch of code for a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

2014-07-14 Thread Todd Previte
This patch set adds the foundational support for Displayport compliance testing in the i915 driver. It implements the framework for automated test support that preclude the need (most) for operator input during testing. Tests for AUX transactions, EDID reads and basic link training have also