Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-16 09:48:48)
>
> On 15/01/2018 20:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
> > i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
> >
> > v2: Account for the rounding up of the timeout to the next second.
> >
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-16 09:48:48)
>
> On 15/01/2018 20:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > +static struct dma_fence *alloc_dma_fence(void)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_fence *dma;
> > +
> > + dma = kmalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (dma)
> > + dma_fence_init(dma, &m
On 15/01/2018 20:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
v2: Account for the rounding up of the timeout to the next second.
Unfortunately, the minimum delay is then 1 second.
Signed-off-by:
Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
v2: Account for the rounding up of the timeout to the next second.
Unfortunately, the minimum delay is then 1 second.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
drive
