Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:46:13PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: Arun Siluvery arun.siluv...@linux.intel.com writes: MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects (reg, addr) pairs so use

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-19 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Arun Siluvery arun.siluv...@linux.intel.com writes: MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects (reg, addr) pairs so use fixed length for these instructions. v2: rebase Cc: Dave Gordon

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-11 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 7001 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied ILK -1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-04 Thread Arun Siluvery
MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects (reg, addr) pairs so use fixed length for these instructions. v2: rebase Cc: Dave Gordon david.s.gor...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery