On to, 2017-07-20 at 14:48 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If the request has been completed before the reset took effect, we don't
> need to mark it up as being a victim. Touching fence->error after the
> fence has been signaled is detected by dma_fence_set_error() and
> triggers a BUG:
>
> [
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:48:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If the request has been completed before the reset took effect, we don't
> need to mark it up as being a victim. Touching fence->error after the
> fence has been signaled is detected by dma_fence_set_error() and
> triggers a BUG:
>
>
If the request has been completed before the reset took effect, we don't
need to mark it up as being a victim. Touching fence->error after the
fence has been signaled is detected by dma_fence_set_error() and
triggers a BUG:
[ 231.743133] kernel BUG at ./include/linux/dma-fence.h:434!
[
