Hey,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>> So I think this starts to look that we should move calling glk_force_audio
>> to bind/unbind pair. I can make a patch for this.
>
> That would stop us from doing dynamic cdclk
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> audio at init time. And we could maybe try to remove the
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> audio at init time. And we could maybe try to remove the
Hey,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> audio at init time. And we could maybe try to remove the modeset from the
>>> put_power() so that at least if you get a blink it's just
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:04:24 +0100,
Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > The remaining question is whether this display_power() call is still
> > needed for the recent chips. Basically it's there for HSW/BDW type
> > chips that need already the power
Hey,
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> The remaining question is whether this display_power() call is still
> needed for the recent chips. Basically it's there for HSW/BDW type
> chips that need already the power for the HDA link that is dedicated
> to HDMI. That is, a patch like
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:16:56 +0100,
Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:25:22 +0100, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >>> One problematic scenario that this doesn't cover:
>
Hey,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:25:22 +0100, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>>> One problematic scenario that this doesn't cover:
>>> - a single display is used (at low cdclk), and
>>> - audio block
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:25:22 +0100,
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> > One problematic scenario that this doesn't cover:
> > - a single display is used (at low cdclk), and
> > - audio block goes to runtime suspend while display stays up.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:45:44 +0100, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >>> Similarly on i915 side, it would seem pretty unlikely that we are going
> >>> to get smooth changes of CDCLK. It
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:45:44 +0100, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>>> Similarly on i915 side, it would seem pretty unlikely that we are going
>>> to get smooth changes of CDCLK. It might work better on some platforms,
>
> There is new hw in the pipeline
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:45:44 +0100,
> Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > [+Takashi from ALSA]
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Matt Roper wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >
Hey,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:45:44 +0100, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>> unfortunately it seems this fix that was done is not holding up in wider
>> testing. It now looks we need to enforce the constraint in one form or
[...]
>> So how about: We move the
On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:45:44 +0100,
Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> [+Takashi from ALSA]
>
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Matt Roper wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Revert changes done in commit f6ec9483091f ("drm/i915: extend audio
>
Hi folks,
[+Takashi from ALSA]
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
Revert changes done in commit f6ec9483091f ("drm/i915: extend audio
CDCLK>=2*BCLK constraint to more platforms"). Audio drivers
>
> Agreed; GLK's
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> >> Revert changes done in commit f6ec9483091f ("drm/i915: extend audio
> >> CDCLK>=2*BCLK constraint to more
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>> Revert changes done in commit f6ec9483091f ("drm/i915: extend audio
>> CDCLK>=2*BCLK constraint to more platforms"). Audio drivers
[...]
>> /* Force CDCLK to 2*BCLK as long
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Revert changes done in commit f6ec9483091f ("drm/i915: extend audio
> CDCLK>=2*BCLK constraint to more platforms"). Audio drivers
> communicate with i915 over HDA bus multiple times during system
> boot-up and each of these
Revert changes done in commit f6ec9483091f ("drm/i915: extend audio
CDCLK>=2*BCLK constraint to more platforms"). Audio drivers
communicate with i915 over HDA bus multiple times during system
boot-up and each of these transactions result in matching
get_power/put_power calls to i915, and depending
19 matches
Mail list logo
