Quoting Peter Zijlstra (2021-09-17 16:13:19)
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:28:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:00:39PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >
> > > > For merge logistics, can we pls have a stable branch? I expect that the
> > > > i915 patches will be
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:28:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:00:39PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
> > > For merge logistics, can we pls have a stable branch? I expect that the
> > > i915 patches will be ready for 5.16.
> > >
> > > Or send it in for -rc2 so
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:00:39PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > For merge logistics, can we pls have a stable branch? I expect that the
> > i915 patches will be ready for 5.16.
> >
> > Or send it in for -rc2 so that the interface change doesn't cause needless
> > conflicts, whatever you
Op 14-09-2021 om 15:54 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 14-09-2021 om 08:50 schreef Peter Zijlstra:
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>
> +/**
> + * ww_mutex_trylock - tries to acquire
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-09-2021 om 08:50 schreef Peter Zijlstra:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * ww_mutex_trylock - tries to acquire the w/w mutex with optional
> >>> acquire context
Op 14-09-2021 om 08:50 schreef Peter Zijlstra:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
>>> +/**
>>> + * ww_mutex_trylock - tries to acquire the w/w mutex with optional acquire
>>> context
>>> + * @ww: mutex to lock
>>> + * @ww_ctx: optional w/w acquire context
>>> +
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * ww_mutex_trylock - tries to acquire the w/w mutex with optional acquire
> > context
> > + * @ww: mutex to lock
> > + * @ww_ctx: optional w/w acquire context
> > + *
> > + * Trylocks a mutex with the optional
Op 10-09-2021 om 17:02 schreef Peter Zijlstra:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:32:18AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
>> index d456579d0952..791c28005eef 100644
>> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
>> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
>> @@
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:32:18AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This is also useful in regulator_lock_nested, which may avoid dropping
> regulator_nesting_mutex in the uncontended path, so use it there.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 05:02:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That doesn't look right, how's this for you?
Full patch for the robots here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/commit/?h=locking/core=826e7b8826f0af185bb93249600533c33fd69a95
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:32:18AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> index d456579d0952..791c28005eef 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> @@ -736,6 +736,44 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock,
Op 09-09-2021 om 10:22 schreef Peter Zijlstra:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:38:06AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
>>> You'll need a similar hunk in ww_rt_mutex.c
>> What tree has that file?
> Linus' tree should have it. Per commit:
>
> f8635d509d80 ("locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based
12 matches
Mail list logo
