Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915: Rename functions to match their entry points

2019-07-12 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-07-11 10:40:02) > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-07-11 08:31:52) > > Need for this was identified while working on split of driver unbind > > path into _remove() and _release() parts. Consistency in function > > naming has been recognized as helpful when trying to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915: Rename functions to match their entry points

2019-07-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-07-11 08:31:52) > Need for this was identified while working on split of driver unbind > path into _remove() and _release() parts. Consistency in function > naming has been recognized as helpful when trying to work out which > phase the code is in. > > v2: *

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915: Rename functions to match their entry points

2019-07-11 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Need for this was identified while working on split of driver unbind path into _remove() and _release() parts. Consistency in function naming has been recognized as helpful when trying to work out which phase the code is in. v2: * early_probe pairs better with late_release (Chris), * exclude