On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:44:55AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 15.01.20 um 15:49 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> @@ -2020,3 +2042,193 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct
> >> drm_device *dev, void *data,
>
Hi
Am 15.01.20 um 15:49 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> The callback get_vblank_timestamp() is currently located in struct
>> drm_driver, but really belongs into struct drm_crtc_funcs. Add an
>> equivalent there. Driver will be convert
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> The callback get_vblank_timestamp() is currently located in struct
> drm_driver, but really belongs into struct drm_crtc_funcs. Add an
> equivalent there. Driver will be converted in separate patches.
>
> The default implementati
The callback get_vblank_timestamp() is currently located in struct
drm_driver, but really belongs into struct drm_crtc_funcs. Add an
equivalent there. Driver will be converted in separate patches.
The default implementation is drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos().
The patch adds drm_crtc_vblank
