Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/i915: Kill off intel_crtc->atomic.wait_vblank.

2015-11-09 Thread Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 08:31 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > By handling this after the atomic helper waits for vblanks there will > be one less wait for vblank in the atomic path. I found this a bit confusing. Sounds like you are referring to calling intel_post_enable_update() after the call to

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/i915: Kill off intel_crtc->atomic.wait_vblank.

2015-11-02 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
By handling this after the atomic helper waits for vblanks there will be one less wait for vblank in the atomic path. Also get rid of the double wait_for_vblank on broadwell, looks like it's a bug doing the vblank wait twice. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst