On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:44:34PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
...snip...
> > > +static int icl_build_plane_wm(struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:44:34PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Make a cleaner split between the skl+ and icl+ ways of computing
> > watermarks. This way skl_build_pipe_wm() doesn't have to know any
> >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Make a cleaner split between the skl+ and icl+ ways of computing
> watermarks. This way skl_build_pipe_wm() doesn't have to know any
> of the gritty details of icl+ master/slave planes.
>
> We can also
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make a cleaner split between the skl+ and icl+ ways of computing
watermarks. This way skl_build_pipe_wm() doesn't have to know any
of the gritty details of icl+ master/slave planes.
We can also simplify a bunch of the lower level code by pulling
the plane visibility checks a
