Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Move uncore definitions into a separate header

2017-05-09 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Michal Wajdeczko writes: > In order to allow use of e.g. forcewake_domains in a other feature headers > included from the top of i915_drv.h, move all uncore related definitions > into their own header. > > v2: move __mask_next_bit macro to utils header (Mika) > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Move uncore definitions into a separate header

2017-05-09 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Michal Wajdeczko writes: > In order to allow use of e.g. forcewake_domains in a other feature headers > included from the top of i915_drv.h, move all uncore related definitions > into their own header. > > v2: move __mask_next_bit macro to utils header (Mika) > >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Move uncore definitions into a separate header

2017-05-09 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
In order to allow use of e.g. forcewake_domains in a other feature headers included from the top of i915_drv.h, move all uncore related definitions into their own header. v2: move __mask_next_bit macro to utils header (Mika) Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko