Am 08.02.22 um 22:08 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
No idea why con2fb_acquire_newinfo() initializes much less than
fbcon_startup(), but so be it. From a quick look most of the
un-initialized stuff should be fairly harmless, but who knows.
Note that the error handling for the con2fb_acquire_newinfo()
No idea why con2fb_acquire_newinfo() initializes much less than
fbcon_startup(), but so be it. From a quick look most of the
un-initialized stuff should be fairly harmless, but who knows.
Note that the error handling for the con2fb_acquire_newinfo() failure
case was very strange: Callers updated c
