Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: improve documentation

2019-10-10 Thread Martin Peres
On 10/10/2019 04:02, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > Add a short description of what we expect from GuC and some minor > improvements to existing documentation. Also remove a comment about a > difference between GuC and HuC that is not true anymore. > > v2: add that the GuC is not mandatory

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: improve documentation

2019-10-09 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
Add a short description of what we expect from GuC and some minor improvements to existing documentation. Also remove a comment about a difference between GuC and HuC that is not true anymore. v2: add that the GuC is not mandatory (Martin) Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Cc: Michal