Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Do not make assumptions on GGTT VMA sizes

2015-05-06 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On to, 2015-04-30 at 13:03 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 04/30/2015 12:19 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: GGTT VMA sizes might be smaller than the whole object size due to different GGTT views. v2: - Separate GGTT view constraint calculations from normal view constraint calculations

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Do not make assumptions on GGTT VMA sizes

2015-04-30 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
GGTT VMA sizes might be smaller than the whole object size due to different GGTT views. v2: - Separate GGTT view constraint calculations from normal view constraint calculations (Chris Wilson) v3: - Do not bother with debug wording. (Tvrtko Ursulin) Cc: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Do not make assumptions on GGTT VMA sizes

2015-04-30 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 04/30/2015 12:19 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: GGTT VMA sizes might be smaller than the whole object size due to different GGTT views. v2: - Separate GGTT view constraint calculations from normal view constraint calculations (Chris Wilson) v3: - Do not bother with debug wording. (Tvrtko