On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 23:46 +, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:42 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 5:41:20 PM PDT José Roberto de Souza
> > wrote:
> > > It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because
"It" is ambiguous here.
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:42 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 5:41:20 PM PDT José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
> > could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
> > still being
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:42 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 5:41:20 PM PDT José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
> > could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
> > still being
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 5:41:20 PM PDT José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
> could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
> still being disabled asynchronously userspace could change the
> modeset causing a
It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
still being disabled asynchronously userspace could change the
modeset causing a call to psr_disable() that will not wait for PSR
idle and then PSR will be enabled
