On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 01:22:04PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > @@ -2327,6 +2350,14 @@ void intel_cleanup_engine(struct intel_engine_cs
> > *engine)
> >
> > i915_cmd_parser_fini_ring(engine);
> > i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(>batch_pool);
> > +
> > + kctx = dev_priv->kernel_context;
On ke, 2016-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This is so that we have symmetry with intel_lrc.c and avoid a source of
> if (i915.enable_execlists) layering violation within i915_gem_context.c -
> that is we move the specific handling of the dev_priv->kernel_context
> for legacy
This is so that we have symmetry with intel_lrc.c and avoid a source of
if (i915.enable_execlists) layering violation within i915_gem_context.c -
that is we move the specific handling of the dev_priv->kernel_context
for legacy submission into the legacy submission code.
This depends upon the
