On Fri, 2020-05-22, 06:35 p.m, Lyude Paul wrote:
>On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 14:35 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:56 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
>> > So far, max dot clock rate for MST mode rely on physcial bandwidth
>> > limitation. It would caused compatibility issue if source
On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 14:35 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:56 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
> > So far, max dot clock rate for MST mode rely on physcial
> > bandwidth limitation. It would caused compatibility issue
> > if source display resolution exceed MST hub output ability.
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:56 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
> So far, max dot clock rate for MST mode rely on physcial
> bandwidth limitation. It would caused compatibility issue
> if source display resolution exceed MST hub output ability.
>
> For example, source DUT had DP 1.2 output capability.
>
So far, max dot clock rate for MST mode rely on physcial
bandwidth limitation. It would caused compatibility issue
if source display resolution exceed MST hub output ability.
For example, source DUT had DP 1.2 output capability.
And MST docking just support HDMI 1.4 spec. When a HDMI 2.0
monitor c
