Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Fix inconsistance between pfit.enable and scaler freeing

2020-01-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2020-01-24 18:15:30) > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 07:23:01PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > Despite that during hw readout we seem to have scalers assigned > > to pipes, then call atomic_setup_scalers, at the commit stage in > > skl_update_scaler there is a check, that if

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Fix inconsistance between pfit.enable and scaler freeing

2020-01-24 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 07:23:01PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > Despite that during hw readout we seem to have scalers assigned > to pipes, then call atomic_setup_scalers, at the commit stage in > skl_update_scaler there is a check, that if we have fb src and > dest of same size, we stage fr

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Fix inconsistance between pfit.enable and scaler freeing

2020-01-24 Thread Stanislav Lisovskiy
Despite that during hw readout we seem to have scalers assigned to pipes, then call atomic_setup_scalers, at the commit stage in skl_update_scaler there is a check, that if we have fb src and dest of same size, we stage freeing of that scaler. However we don't update pfit.enabled flag then, which