Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/39] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

On 8/29/2019 6:29 PM, Mike Marshall wrote: Hi John... I added this patch series on top of Linux 5.3rc6 and ran xfstests with no regressions... Acked-by: Mike Marshall Hi Mike (and I hope Ira and others are reading as well, because I'm making a bunch of claims further down), That's great

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/39] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

Hi John... I added this patch series on top of Linux 5.3rc6 and ran xfstests with no regressions... Acked-by: Mike Marshall -Mike On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:50 PM John Hubbard wrote: > > On 8/6/19 6:32 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: John Hubbard > > ... > > > > John Hubbard (38):

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/39] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

On 8/6/19 6:32 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote: > From: John Hubbard > ... > > John Hubbard (38): > mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock() ... > 54 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-) > ahem, yes, apparently this is what happens if I add a few patches while

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/39] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

From: John Hubbard Hi, This consolidates everything into a "here's what's remaining for Andrew to add to his tree (for now)" series: * The first patch is an updated version of one that is already in the akpm tree. * The next two patches are already in the akpm tree, included here for