On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:03:32PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 1/5/23 7:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:16:37PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah, this is also what I was thinking, replace the direct
> >> kvm_put_kvm calls with, say,
On 1/5/23 6:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 03:09:30PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
>> Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>
>>> Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
>>> the group, let's assume that the association has
On 1/5/23 7:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:16:37PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>
>> Yeah, this is also what I was thinking, replace the direct
>> kvm_put_kvm calls with, say, schedule_delayed_work in each driver,
>> where the delayed task just does the kvm_put_kvm
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:16:37PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Yeah, this is also what I was thinking, replace the direct
> kvm_put_kvm calls with, say, schedule_delayed_work in each driver,
> where the delayed task just does the kvm_put_kvm (along with a brief
> comment explaining why we
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 03:09:30PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
> Matthew Rosato wrote:
>
> > Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
> > the group, let's assume that the association has already been
> > made prior to device_open. The
On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
> the group, let's assume that the association has already been
> made prior to device_open. The first time a device is opened
> associate the group KVM with the device.
>
On 5/23/22 4:41 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> Hi Zhi & Zhenyu,
>
> Please review gvt changes below, I'd prefer to get your ack included.
> Thanks!
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
> Matthew Rosato wrote:
>
>> Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
>>
Hi Zhi & Zhenyu,
Please review gvt changes below, I'd prefer to get your ack included.
Thanks!
Alex
On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
> the group, let's assume that the association has already been
>
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
