On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 11:41:29 CET Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 21/11/2022 23:19, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Hi Andrzej,
> >
> > Thanks for providing your R-b.
> >
> > On Monday, 21 November 2022 18:40:51 CET Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >> On 21.11.2022 15:56, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>
On 21/11/2022 23:19, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
Thanks for providing your R-b.
On Monday, 21 November 2022 18:40:51 CET Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 21.11.2022 15:56, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
Commit b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC")
Hi Andrzej,
Thanks for providing your R-b.
On Monday, 21 November 2022 18:40:51 CET Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 21.11.2022 15:56, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Commit b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
> > with GuC") extended the API of
On 21.11.2022 15:56, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
Commit b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC") extended the API of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() with an
extra argument 'remaining_timeout', intended for passing back unconsumed
portion of requested timeout
Commit b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC") extended the API of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() with an
extra argument 'remaining_timeout', intended for passing back unconsumed
portion of requested timeout when 0 (success) is returned. However, when
