Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/9] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-12-05 15:34:36) > Two bits missing imo: > - Should explain that userspace should poll this property to detect a > change from ENABLED to DESIRED (and take adequate actions and e.g. stop > the stream). No uevent will be sent out because the HDCP specs require >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/9] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:15:02AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > This patch adds a new optional connector property to allow userspace to enable > protection over the content it is displaying. This will typically be > implemented > by the driver using HDCP. > > The property is a tri-state with the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/9] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:07:58AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 12/05/2017 06:15 AM, Sean Paul wrote: > > This patch adds a new optional connector property to allow userspace to > > enable > > protection over the content it is displaying. This will typically be > > implemented > > by the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/9] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 12/05/2017 06:15 AM, Sean Paul wrote: > This patch adds a new optional connector property to allow userspace to enable > protection over the content it is displaying. This will typically be > implemented > by the driver using HDCP. > > The property is a tri-state with the following values: >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/9] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-04 Thread Sean Paul
This patch adds a new optional connector property to allow userspace to enable protection over the content it is displaying. This will typically be implemented by the driver using HDCP. The property is a tri-state with the following values: - OFF: Self explanatory, no content protection -