On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > On 05/04/17 18:06, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:23:19PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
> > >> An oa_exponent_to_ns()
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 05/04/17 18:06, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:23:19PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
> >> An oa_exponent_to_ns() utility and per-gen timebase constants where
> >> recently removed when updating the tail
On 05/04/17 18:06, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:23:19PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
An oa_exponent_to_ns() utility and per-gen timebase constants where
recently removed when updating the tail pointer race condition WA, and
this restores those so we can update the
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:23:19PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
> An oa_exponent_to_ns() utility and per-gen timebase constants where
> recently removed when updating the tail pointer race condition WA, and
> this restores those so we can update the _PROP_OA_EXPONENT validation
> done in
Hey Rob,
Thanks for sending this, it looks good to me.
I think we also need to update the oa_sample_rate_hard_limit &
i915_oa_max_sample_rate variables.
This patch is :
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin
On 05/04/17 17:23, Robert Bragg wrote:
An
An oa_exponent_to_ns() utility and per-gen timebase constants where
recently removed when updating the tail pointer race condition WA, and
this restores those so we can update the _PROP_OA_EXPONENT validation
done in read_properties_unlocked() to not assume we have a 12.5KHz
timebase as we did for