Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/guc: capture GuC logs if FW fails to load

2017-05-16 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:47:16PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > > > On 15/05/17 10:41, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:35:30AM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > > > We're currently deleting the GuC logs if the FW fails to load, but those > > > are still

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/guc: capture GuC logs if FW fails to load

2017-05-15 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 15/05/17 10:41, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:35:30AM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: We're currently deleting the GuC logs if the FW fails to load, but those are still useful to understand why the loading failed. Keeping the object around allows us to access them

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/guc: capture GuC logs if FW fails to load

2017-05-15 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:35:30AM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > We're currently deleting the GuC logs if the FW fails to load, but those > are still useful to understand why the loading failed. Keeping the > object around allows us to access them after driver load is completed. > > v2:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/guc: capture GuC logs if FW fails to load

2017-05-15 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
We're currently deleting the GuC logs if the FW fails to load, but those are still useful to understand why the loading failed. Keeping the object around allows us to access them after driver load is completed. v2: keep the object around instead of using kernel memory (chris) don't store the