On ti, 2016-10-18 at 14:39 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> It's in my tree (on top of nightly) already with Joonas' r-b.
Patch 1/2 seems to have my comments already, could be addressed and
respined too.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:55:12PM +0530, Goel, Akash wrote:
>
>
> On 10/18/2016 5:35 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> >On ma, 2016-04-04 at 14:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>From: Akash Goel
> >>
> >>On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get
>
On 10/18/2016 5:35 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On ma, 2016-04-04 at 14:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
From: Akash Goel
On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get
fragmented severely, which considerably slows down the system. In such a
scenario, the
On ma, 2016-04-04 at 14:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> From: Akash Goel
>
> On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get
> fragmented severely, which considerably slows down the system. In such a
> scenario, the shrinker is also unable to help as lack
From: Akash Goel
On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get
fragmented severely, which considerably slows down the system. In such a
scenario, the shrinker is also unable to help as lack of memory is not
the actual problem, since it has been observed