Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Make GPU pages movable

2016-10-19 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ti, 2016-10-18 at 14:39 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > It's in my tree (on top of nightly) already with Joonas' r-b. Patch 1/2 seems to have my comments already, could be addressed and respined too. Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Make GPU pages movable

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:55:12PM +0530, Goel, Akash wrote: > > > On 10/18/2016 5:35 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > >On ma, 2016-04-04 at 14:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>From: Akash Goel > >> > >>On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Make GPU pages movable

2016-10-18 Thread Goel, Akash
On 10/18/2016 5:35 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: On ma, 2016-04-04 at 14:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: From: Akash Goel On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get fragmented severely, which considerably slows down the system. In such a scenario, the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Make GPU pages movable

2016-10-18 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ma, 2016-04-04 at 14:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > From: Akash Goel > > On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get > fragmented severely, which considerably slows down the system. In such a > scenario, the shrinker is also unable to help as lack

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Make GPU pages movable

2016-04-04 Thread Chris Wilson
From: Akash Goel On a long run of more than 2-3 days, physical memory tends to get fragmented severely, which considerably slows down the system. In such a scenario, the shrinker is also unable to help as lack of memory is not the actual problem, since it has been observed