Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-10-23 Thread Lis, Tomasz
On 2018-10-23 11:13, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Quoting Lis, Tomasz (2018-10-19 19:00:15) On 2018-10-16 12:53, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-10-15 20:29:18) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-10-23 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Lis, Tomasz (2018-10-19 19:00:15) > > > On 2018-10-16 12:53, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-10-15 20:29:18) > >> The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper > >> bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-10-19 Thread Lis, Tomasz
On 2018-10-16 12:53, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-10-15 20:29:18) The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from Context Status Buffer. Preemption in previous gens required

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-10-16 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-10-15 20:29:18) > The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper > bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from > Context Status Buffer. > > Preemption in previous gens required a special batch buffer to be executed,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.

2018-10-15 Thread Tomasz Lis
The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from Context Status Buffer. Preemption in previous gens required a special batch buffer to be executed, so the Command Streamer never preempted to idle