Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Added Wa_18022495364

2023-09-28 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 14/09/2023 17:49, Matt Roper wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 07:17:24PM +0530, Dnyaneshwar Bhadane wrote: Set the instruction and state cache invalidate bit using INDIRECT_CTX on every gpu context switch. The goal of this workaround is to actually perform an explicit invalidation of that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Added Wa_18022495364

2023-09-14 Thread Matt Roper
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 07:17:24PM +0530, Dnyaneshwar Bhadane wrote: > Set the instruction and state cache invalidate bit using INDIRECT_CTX on > every gpu context switch. > The goal of this workaround is to actually perform an explicit > invalidation of that cache (by re-writing the register)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Added Wa_18022495364

2023-09-14 Thread Kandpal, Suraj
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Added Wa_18022495364 > Commit message style should be imperative so the header becomes something Around the lines of "Add Wa_18022495364" > Set the instruction and state cache invalidate bit using INDIRECT_CTX on every &

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Added Wa_18022495364

2023-09-14 Thread Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
Set the instruction and state cache invalidate bit using INDIRECT_CTX on every gpu context switch. The goal of this workaround is to actually perform an explicit invalidation of that cache (by re-writing the register) during every GPU context switch, which is accomplished via a "workaround