Looks like trying to move the vma up into guc-upper is impacting many other
functions
in intel_guc_log and intel_guc_log_debugfs. I'll have to take it back (the
level of
redesign i shall attempt with this series).
I'll just move the log_stats back into intel_guc_log and have intel_guc_capture
Matt, just a final confirmation on below
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:19 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:48:18AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > If the object lives at the GuC level, operate on it at the GuC level.
> >
> > e.g.
> >
On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 19:34 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:55:07PM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:18 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:38:13AM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> > > > Hi Matt, thank
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 07:34:37PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:55:07PM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:18 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:38:13AM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> > > > Hi
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:55:07PM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:18 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:38:13AM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> > > Hi Matt, thank you for taking the time to review the codes.
> > > Answering
On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:18 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:38:13AM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> > Hi Matt, thank you for taking the time to review the codes.
> > Answering your question inline below.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:19 -0800, Matthew
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:38:13AM -0800, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> Hi Matt, thank you for taking the time to review the codes.
> Answering your question inline below.
>
>
> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:19 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:48:18AM -0800, Alan Previn
Hi Matt, thank you for taking the time to review the codes.
Answering your question inline below.
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:19 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:48:18AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> > GuC log buffer regions for debug-log-events, crash-dumps and
> >
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:48:18AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> GuC log buffer regions for debug-log-events, crash-dumps and
> error-state-capture are all a single bo allocation that includes
> the guc_log_buffer_state structures.
>
> Since the error-capture region is accessed with high priority
As per the rev 5 CI results between this patch and patch7, i have introduced a
lockdep splat bug, i shall fix that in
the next rev.
...alan
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 02:48 -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> GuC log buffer regions for debug-log-events, crash-dumps and
> error-state-capture are all a single
GuC log buffer regions for debug-log-events, crash-dumps and
error-state-capture are all a single bo allocation that includes
the guc_log_buffer_state structures.
Since the error-capture region is accessed with high priority at non-
deterministic times (as part of gpu coredump) while the
11 matches
Mail list logo
