Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/10] drm/i915/guc: Follow legacy register names

2022-02-04 Thread Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
Squash will be much easier if i also squash all the prior register table additions together Should i do that? Squash XeLP + DG2 + Gen9 and this together? On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 11:09 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:48:21AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote: > > Before we print the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/10] drm/i915/guc: Follow legacy register names

2022-02-03 Thread Matthew Brost
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:48:21AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote: > Before we print the GuC provided register dumps, modify the > register tables to use string names as per the legacy error > capture execlist codes. > > Signed-off-by: Alan Previn I'd just squash this to the patches early in the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/10] drm/i915/guc: Follow legacy register names

2022-01-26 Thread Alan Previn
Before we print the GuC provided register dumps, modify the register tables to use string names as per the legacy error capture execlist codes. Signed-off-by: Alan Previn --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c| 70 +-- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 35