On Thu, 18 May 2023 02:07:55 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2023 17:25, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 May 2023 01:26:15 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17/05/2023 07:55, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:25:50PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wr
On 17/05/2023 17:25, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2023 01:26:15 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 17/05/2023 07:55, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:25:50PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:35:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
Hi U
On Wed, 17 May 2023 13:15:14 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> Leaving it as is. @Ashutosh, okay to use your R-b without any changes to
> this patch?
Yes.
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:25:03AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2023 01:26:15 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 17/05/2023 07:55, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:25:50PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:35:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige R
On Wed, 17 May 2023 01:26:15 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/2023 07:55, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:25:50PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:35:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Umesh/Tvrtko,
> >>
> >> Mos
On 17/05/2023 07:55, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:25:50PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:35:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
Hi Umesh/Tvrtko,
Mostly repeating comments/questions made on the previous patch below.
First of all thanks
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:25:50PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:35:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
Hi Umesh/Tvrtko,
Mostly repeating comments/questions made on the previous patch below.
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Having it as u64 was a confusing (but harmless) mi
On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:35:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
Hi Umesh/Tvrtko,
Mostly repeating comments/questions made on the previous patch below.
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Having it as u64 was a confusing (but harmless) mistake.
>
> Also add some asserts to make sure the internal field
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Having it as u64 was a confusing (but harmless) mistake.
Also add some asserts to make sure the internal field does not overflow
in the future.
v2: Fix WARN_ON firing for INTERRUPT event (Umesh)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Cc: Ashut