On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 01:43:43PM -0700, Casey Bowman wrote:
Splitting i915_run_as_guest into a more arch-friendly function
as non-x86 builds do not support this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Casey Bowman
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
now we have CI results and they look ok. I reworded the
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:04:54AM -0700, Casey Bowman wrote:
@Jani/Lucas, any other thoughts here?
last version didn't pass CI:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102041/
when this happens, developer should analyze the results to check if it's
a regression from their changes. When
@Jani/Lucas, any other thoughts here?
Regards,
Casey
On 3/31/22 13:43, Casey Bowman wrote:
Splitting i915_run_as_guest into a more arch-friendly function
as non-x86 builds do not support this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Casey Bowman
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
Splitting i915_run_as_guest into a more arch-friendly function
as non-x86 builds do not support this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Casey Bowman
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
