On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 16:14 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2023, "Govindapillai, Vinod"
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 12:01 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 May 2023, Vinod Govindapillai
> > > wrote:
> > > > From MTL onwwards, pcode locks the QGV point based on peak
On Tue, 23 May 2023, "Govindapillai, Vinod"
wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 12:01 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 May 2023, Vinod Govindapillai
>> wrote:
>> > From MTL onwwards, pcode locks the QGV point based on peak BW of
>> > the intended QGV point passed by the driver. So the peak
On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 12:01 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2023, Vinod Govindapillai
> wrote:
> > From MTL onwwards, pcode locks the QGV point based on peak BW of
> > the intended QGV point passed by the driver. So the peak BW
> > calculation must match the value expected by the
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Vinod Govindapillai wrote:
> From MTL onwwards, pcode locks the QGV point based on peak BW of
> the intended QGV point passed by the driver. So the peak BW
> calculation must match the value expected by the pcode. Update
> the calculations as per the Bspec.
>
> v2: use
>From MTL onwwards, pcode locks the QGV point based on peak BW of
the intended QGV point passed by the driver. So the peak BW
calculation must match the value expected by the pcode. Update
the calculations as per the Bspec.
v2: use DIV_ROUND_* macro for the calculations (Ville)
Bspec: 64636
