On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 08:15:52PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:23:06PM +0530, C, Ramalingam wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In one of the offline discussion Tomas has shared his review comments on
> > > v8.
> >
> > Let's please have all review here on the mailing
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:23:06PM +0530, C, Ramalingam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In one of the offline discussion Tomas has shared his review comments on v8.
>
> Let's please have all review here on the mailing list for better coordination.
> Playing a game of telephone isn't efficient.
It's not
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:23:06PM +0530, C, Ramalingam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In one of the offline discussion Tomas has shared his review comments on v8.
Let's please have all review here on the mailing list for better
coordination. Playing a game of telephone isn't efficient.
> So I am sharing the
Hi,
In one of the offline discussion Tomas has shared his review comments on v8.
So I am sharing the abstract of his suggestions here for the discussion and for
the agreement of interface in the community.
Tomas please correct/add if I am missing any points.
1. Remove the
Data structures and Enum for the I915-MEI_HDCP interface are defined
at
v2:
Rebased.
v3:
mei_cl_device is removed from mei_hdcp_data [Tomas]
v4:
Comment style and typo fixed [Uma]
v5:
Rebased.
v6:
No changes.
v7:
Remove redundant text from the License header
Change uintXX_t type to
