Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/16] drm/i915/display: Use to_gt() helper for GGTT accesses

2021-12-17 Thread Matt Roper
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:33:42PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: > From: Michał Winiarski > > GGTT is currently available both through i915->ggtt and gt->ggtt, and we > eventually want to get rid of the i915->ggtt one. > Use to_gt() for all i915->ggtt accesses to help with the future > refactoring. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/16] drm/i915/display: Use to_gt() helper for GGTT accesses

2021-12-16 Thread Sundaresan, Sujaritha
On 12/14/2021 11:33 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: From: Michał Winiarski GGTT is currently available both through i915->ggtt and gt->ggtt, and we eventually want to get rid of the i915->ggtt one. Use to_gt() for all i915->ggtt accesses to help with the future refactoring. Signed-off-by: Michał

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/16] drm/i915/display: Use to_gt() helper for GGTT accesses

2021-12-14 Thread Andi Shyti
From: Michał Winiarski GGTT is currently available both through i915->ggtt and gt->ggtt, and we eventually want to get rid of the i915->ggtt one. Use to_gt() for all i915->ggtt accesses to help with the future refactoring. Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski Cc: Michal Wajdeczko Signed-off-by: