Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK

2020-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Manasi Navare (2020-05-21 22:28:42) > Pushed the series to dinq, thank you for patches and reviews Could you tidy up the mess of the merge? Things like cd19154608610ab4cdd6c039e9214b8dd281845c: --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c @@

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK

2020-05-21 Thread Manasi Navare
Pushed the series to dinq, thank you for patches and reviews Regards Manasi On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:11:10PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > We need to calculate cdclk after watermarks/ddb has been calculated > as with recent hw CDCLK needs to be adjusted accordingly to DBuf >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK

2020-05-19 Thread Stanislav Lisovskiy
We need to calculate cdclk after watermarks/ddb has been calculated as with recent hw CDCLK needs to be adjusted accordingly to DBuf requirements, which is not possible with current code organization. Setting CDCLK according to DBuf BW requirements and not just rejecting if it doesn't satisfy BW