Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-11-28 10:16:17) > Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-11-28 10:08:56) > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Chris Wilson > > wrote: > > > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-11-28 08:15:13) > > >> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 16:54 +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:16:50PM +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:10:37PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > > I feel we generally tend to ignore the results mails for series that > > we are not actively involved on (although we might be interested in > > series itself).

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:10:37PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > I feel we generally tend to ignore the results mails for series that > we are not actively involved on (although we might be interested in > series itself). Also if number of revisions some series can undergo is > high, this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-11-28 10:08:56) > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-11-28 08:15:13) > >> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 16:54 +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > >> > Hey all, > >> > > >> > For some time already CI

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-11-28 08:15:13) >> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 16:54 +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: >> > Hey all, >> > >> > For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. >> > BAT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-11-28 08:15:13) > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 16:54 +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. > > BAT > > results and "full IGT" results (if BAT has not failed). > > > > Recently we have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > Hey all, > > For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. BAT > results and "full IGT" results (if BAT has not failed). > > Recently we have added 32bit build check, and if that fails

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On 27/11/2017 14:54, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: Hey all, For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. BAT results and "full IGT" results (if BAT has not failed). Recently we have added 32bit build check, and if that fails it sends out additional mail In-Reply-To the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 16:54 +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > Hey all, > > For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. BAT > results and "full IGT" results (if BAT has not failed). > > Recently we have added 32bit build check, and if that fails it sends out >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 02:54:02PM +, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > Hey all, > > For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. BAT > results and "full IGT" results (if BAT has not failed). > > Recently we have added 32bit build check, and if that fails it sends out >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

I feel we generally tend to ignore the results mails for series that we are not actively involved on (although we might be interested in series itself). Also if number of revisions some series can undergo is high, this tendency can grow. How about the option of sending the results mails to

[Intel-gfx] [QUERY] How many CI mails is too many?

Hey all, For some time already CI sends out 1-2 mails per series per (re)run, i.e. BAT results and "full IGT" results (if BAT has not failed). Recently we have added 32bit build check, and if that fails it sends out additional mail In-Reply-To the series. I am working on adding some static