On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:56:47 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Unfortunately, (2) complicates our mode list output. If you query for
available modes, you'll definitely see some that you can't drive with
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:31:44 +0100
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:56:47 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Unfortunately, (2) complicates our mode list output. If you
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:31:44 +0100, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
You can't say no there, you need to make a decision from the
information provided.
Yeah, you'd end up having to use two modes with the same clock. Let's
hope DisplayPort ends up a lot more popular than it has gotten so
This set of patches lays the groundwork for supporting 3 pipes on IVB
hardware. We've only tested it so far with 2 HDMI plus 1 VGA (a
configuration that doesn't work), and are awaiting 3 DP port hardware
(the officially supported config) to complete our testing.
So this patchset is necessary but
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:56:47 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Unfortunately, (2) complicates our mode list output. If you query for
available modes, you'll definitely see some that you can't drive with 3
pipes enabled. I'm not sure if the best way to handle that...
All we
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 16:56, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:25:17 -0700
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
This set of patches lays the groundwork for supporting 3 pipes on IVB
hardware. We've only tested it so far with 2 HDMI plus 1 VGA (a
