On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 19:35:51 -0500
Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
That aside I guess I need to elaborate on what makes dpms special in
i915, and why there's a real difference between crtc-enable == true
-active ==
Hi all,
After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
But there's a few things which are seriously wrong with DPMS, so I've
figured I'll start a discussion about them first - converting to atomic
looks like a good time
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Hi all,
After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
But there's a few things which are seriously wrong with DPMS, so I've
figured I'll start a
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Hi all,
After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
But there's a few
2. Cloned configurations
Currently dpms is set per-connector, and the crtc helpers only shut down
the specific encoder. Only when all connectors are off will it shut down
the crtc, too. That pretty much defeats the point of the new helpers of
always enabling/disabling a given output pipeline
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Hi all,
After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
But there's a few things which are seriously wrong with DPMS, so I've
figured I'll start
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Sean Paul seanp...@chromium.org wrote:
Proposal: Only shut down anything (and then the hole output pipe with all
cloned outputs) when all connector's dpms property is set to off. And
enable it again as soon as one property goes to on.
Well, it isn't quite the
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
All this only matters for cloned configs anyway only, which is about
i915 for gen2, roughly. Well Ville implemented cloning for some more
recent stuff too.
Ok, I've grepped: Beside i915 there's only radeon which has a
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Stéphane Marchesin
stephane.marche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Hi all,
After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Proposal. Add a new boolean -active to the crtc state, which will track
the dpms state of the crtc. Add a helper to the atomic core functions
which will compute -active from the state update according to the
proposals for
10 matches
Mail list logo
