Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/10] drm: Track clients by tgid and not tid

Am 15.03.23 um 10:52 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: Hi, On 14/03/2023 15:33, Christian König wrote: Am 14.03.23 um 15:18 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Thread group id (aka pid from userspace point of view) is a more interesting thing to show as an owner of a DRM fd, so track and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/10] drm: Track clients by tgid and not tid

Hi, On 14/03/2023 15:33, Christian König wrote: Am 14.03.23 um 15:18 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Thread group id (aka pid from userspace point of view) is a more interesting thing to show as an owner of a DRM fd, so track and show that instead of the thread id. In the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/10] drm: Track clients by tgid and not tid

Am 14.03.23 um 15:18 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Thread group id (aka pid from userspace point of view) is a more interesting thing to show as an owner of a DRM fd, so track and show that instead of the thread id. In the next patch we will make the owner updated post file

[Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/10] drm: Track clients by tgid and not tid

From: Tvrtko Ursulin Thread group id (aka pid from userspace point of view) is a more interesting thing to show as an owner of a DRM fd, so track and show that instead of the thread id. In the next patch we will make the owner updated post file descriptor handover, which will also be tgid based